This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1899 Excerpt: ...and how remains dubious.--6. On names Gershon, Kehalk, Merari, cf. 5 (61).--7. La dan and Shime'i La dan also in 26, elsewhere Libni and Shime'i, cf. 6 Ex. 6 Nu. 3. Zockler escapes the difficulty by considering La dan a descendant of Libni. More recently this view has been put forward with confidence by Berlin (7. C. p ...
Read More
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1899 Excerpt: ...and how remains dubious.--6. On names Gershon, Kehalk, Merari, cf. 5 (61).--7. La dan and Shime'i La dan also in 26, elsewhere Libni and Shime'i, cf. 6 Ex. 6 Nu. 3. Zockler escapes the difficulty by considering La dan a descendant of Libni. More recently this view has been put forward with confidence by Berlin (7. C. p. 292 B). The variation may be the result of different traditions. La'dan also occurs as the name of an Ephraimite 7 j--8-11. Ladan had three sons (v. ) and Shimei four (v. I0), two of which united to make one fathers' house, since they had few sons (v. ). A second Shimei with three sons is found between these two (v. ). Although v. connects this Shimei with the family of Ladan, his relationship is not indicated. J. H. Michaelis, following Kimchi, considered this Shime i a son of La dan (Hie Schimhi, inquit, non est Gersonis Jilius v. ' sed unus ex Lahdanitis v. ). Berlin (/. c.) holds that he is a brother of La'dan, both being the sons of Libni (v. i. text. n.). Still another solution has been suggested by Benzinger, who considers v. - a gloss which has crept into the wrong place and properly belonged with v. 10, adducing as proof that v., b belongs with v.-. But v. as a gloss to v. is more inexplicable than where it now stands, and v., b is unnecessary after v.. V., b itself is best explained as a gloss inserted to escape the difficulty caused by the two-fold appearance of Shimei. After striking out v. -b, the first Shimei (v.--) is to be identified with the second son of Gershon (v.'), and Shimei (OD) of v. ' is probably a textual error for Shelomoth (niOty). In 24 a Jahath is chief of the sons of Shelomoth, but there the latter is represented as a son of Izhar. Th...
Read Less
Add this copy of A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Books of to cart. $35.17, new condition, Sold by Just one more Chapter rated 3.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Miramar, FL, UNITED STATES, published 2011 by Nabu Press.
Add this copy of A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Books of to cart. $57.86, good condition, Sold by Bonita rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Santa Clarita, CA, UNITED STATES, published 2011 by Nabu Press.
Add this copy of A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Books of to cart. $85.85, new condition, Sold by Bonita rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Santa Clarita, CA, UNITED STATES, published 2011 by Nabu Press.
