Many definitions of postmodernism focus on its nature as the aftermath of the modern industrial age when technology developed. This book extends that analysis to postmodernism by looking at the status of science, technology, and the arts, the significance of technocracy, and the way the flow of information is controlled in the Western world.
Read More
Many definitions of postmodernism focus on its nature as the aftermath of the modern industrial age when technology developed. This book extends that analysis to postmodernism by looking at the status of science, technology, and the arts, the significance of technocracy, and the way the flow of information is controlled in the Western world.
Read Less
Add this copy of The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge to cart. $7.96, fair condition, Sold by ThriftBooks-Baltimore rated 5.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Halethorpe, MD, UNITED STATES, published 1984 by University of Minnesota Press.
Add this copy of The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge (Theory to cart. $8.00, very good condition, Sold by Santa Fe Used Books rated 5.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Santa Fe, NM, UNITED STATES, published 1984 by University Of Minnesota Press.
Add this copy of The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge to cart. $13.06, good condition, Sold by ThriftBooks-Baltimore rated 5.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Halethorpe, MD, UNITED STATES, published 1984 by Manchester University Press.
Add this copy of The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge to cart. $17.05, like new condition, Sold by GreatBookPrices rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Columbia, MD, UNITED STATES, published 1984 by Manchester University Press.
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
Fine. Intended for college/higher education audience. In Stock. 100% Money Back Guarantee. Brand New, Perfect Condition, allow 4-14 business days for standard shipping. To Alaska, Hawaii, U.S. protectorate, P.O. box, and APO/FPO addresses allow 4-28 business days for Standard shipping. No expedited shipping. All orders placed with expedited shipping will be cancelled. Over 3, 000, 000 happy customers.
Add this copy of The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge (Theory to cart. $17.06, good condition, Sold by Big River Books rated 5.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Powder Springs, GA, UNITED STATES, published 1984 by Manchester University Press.
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
This book is in good condition. The cover has minor creases or bends. The binding is tight and pages are intact. Some pages may have writing or highlighting.
Add this copy of The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge to cart. $22.47, good condition, Sold by Anybook rated 5.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Lincoln, UNITED KINGDOM, published 1986 by Manchester University Press.
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside. This book has soft covers. In good all round condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item, 350grams, ISBN: 9780719014505.
Add this copy of The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge to cart. $23.18, new condition, Sold by GreatBookPrices rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Columbia, MD, UNITED STATES, published 1984 by Manchester University Press.
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
New. Intended for college/higher education audience. In Stock. 100% Money Back Guarantee. Brand New, Perfect Condition, allow 4-14 business days for standard shipping. To Alaska, Hawaii, U.S. protectorate, P.O. box, and APO/FPO addresses allow 4-28 business days for Standard shipping. No expedited shipping. All orders placed with expedited shipping will be cancelled. Over 3, 000, 000 happy customers.
The ?Post-modern condition? is ?incredulity toward meta-narratives? that arises from everyone?s supposed disappointment that Marxism or even Democracy will produce a better society. These ideologies have disappointed because culture is constituted in some unexplained way by knowledge. Lyotard does not define a ?condition,? but it must be wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth in the academy.
Knowledge he defines as competence (18) and he says knowledge comes in two types: scientific and narrative. (He provides no information about the empirical grounding for this distinction.) Scientific knowledge is ?verification about a referent? set apart from language games that form social bonds.? Scientific knowledge requires a teacher who is uniquely qualified to determine what is falsifiable (Popperism) and timeless. Second, narrative knowledge (never explicitly defined) is any anecdote about the success or failure of a hero that proceeds by descriptive language about unverified events in a certain time. Scientific knowledge should be empirically verified by perfect measurements, but narrative knowledge can be verified only on the basis of trust in the narrator (the Professor, of coure)
There are two ?grand narratives,? he says: a ?grand narrative of emancipation? (Marxism, Democracy) and a ?grand narrative of speculation? (the academy). He skirts the first, but discusses the second in interesting evaluation of the French and German models for the university. The French model is the Napoleonic educational model of primary education for a technical class. The German model is the general education of a knowledge class.
The ?grand narratives? are ?disappointing? because Lyotard has the academic?s expectation that science really ought to cook up a happy and just society. Systems theorists and ideologues identify the social system with ?a totality in quest of its most ?performative? unity possible.? (?Performativity? is research based in the technology of measurement. ?Performativity? is contrasted to ?delegitimation,? which is some combination of disappointment in Marxism and Democracy and disappointment in the imperfection of systems of measurement.) Because of this supposed disappointment, ?systems theory and the kind of legitimation it proposes have no scientific basis whatsoever.? (61)
Thus, Lyotard has the naïve positivist misunderstanding of systems theory in social science that the difference between a stable and a moving equilibrium is the difference between immobility and change.
His reason systems theory has ?no scientific basis? is that Heisenberg and Gödel argue that ?continuous differentiable function is losing its pre-eminence as a paradigm of knowledge and prediction.? (60) Structure cannot be grounded on co-existing immeasurables, he thinks. (This means that no system can be emergent, he thinks, which illustrates his naïve positivist position.) Legitimation, he says, is now by ?paralogy? (false reasoning). Lyotard admires J. S. Bell?s theorem that no theory of local hidden necessities can replace the predictions of quantum mechanics. However, in this, he simply reduces external reality to the perception of it.
Reducing reality to perception drives his cynical reduction of social interaction to game theory. Performances and narratives are just zero-sum games, in which the sinister scientists and ideologues in the academy and the bureaucracy work their powers to drive each other out of the pentagram of postmodern incredulity.
